Saudi Arabia allie Prince Bandar 'Bush'(,becuase of his close ties to Bush family),suspect along with Israelis of ICTS International who 'guarded' ex Massachusetts Senator John Kerry's Logan Airport Boston on September 11,2001.While Bandar Bush was Saudi Ambassador to the U.S.he and his wife actually provided financial aid through Jonathan Bush's scandalous Riggs Bank to Saudis later implicated in 9/11 who allegedly boarded flights at Boston Logan abnd Newark New Jersey airports.However as Israeli agent Menahem Atzmon and other Shin Bet - Mossad agents controlling ICTS and its Huntleigh airport security subsidiary,( bought with stock fraud against American investors), the never provided any video surveillance at Logan documenting Egytian Mohamed Atta and his alledged Saudi suicide-terrorist group boarding at either airport it is unlikely they ever did and if so were acting in collusion and cooperation with U.S. and Israeli agents carrying out their 9711701 'false flag' terrorism at the WTC in NYC and at the Pentagon. :
Press TV-Aug 30, 2013
Saudi Prince Bandar behind chemical attack in Syria: Report ... Damascus suburb of Ghouta saySaudi Arabia provided chemical weapons for ...
Syria,9/11,WTC,ICTS International,Israel,Logan Airport: Sec of State John Kerry A Zionist Terrorist,Traitor
Ex U.S.Massachusetts Senator and present Secretary of State John Kerry lies outright as if Syria's government using 'chemical weapons' as fact just as W Bush lied outright about Saddam Hussein and Iraq having WMDs as an even more devious lie than Hitler and te Nais used as a pretext for invading and occupying Poland in WWII.
It is particularly repugnant for the U.S. government and its masters to use John Kerry to bring this lie to the U.S. public as if it were fact because he was one of the very Zionists who used their political postions in Massachusetts in order to cover up all Iraeli as well as Saudi involvement in 9/11 - particularly for the Israelis of ICTS International............
Im sorry I was ever taken in by John Kerry playing the role of the repent 'war hero' and throwing his silver medal away in the US. as a protest against the evil he and his fellow soldiers or officers had been drawn into by lies of the U.S.government in Viet Nam.And then I thought John Kerry's role a Senator investigating the Iran Contra scandal over twenty yesr ago was admirable,not knowing then that it is just as important what
one leaves out of an 'investigation' as what those running the investigation include.In other words now in retrospect it doesn't appear that John Kerry or other Senators investigationg Iran Contra even brought Israel into even a cameo role or even mentioned them during the hearings !Had these Senators particulary John Kerry not a been bought or bribed to leave Israel out of the Iran Contra history ? Could this very fact in the early 1990's of covering up Israel's role in Iran-Contra and running drug and arms in Central America to finance the early stages of a war between Iraq and Iran in the Middle East and allowing it to go unreported and unpunished not have been a contributor to the even bolder Israeli role 'false flag' attack on the WTC on 9/11/01 ?
Apparently the Israelis have been correct in assuming the U.S.government and CIA and military industrial complex that the Pentagon beats to the drum of,particularly the likes of John Kerry, and his ilk would be in control of the government at its highest levels and cover up for them again just as Kerry and his ilk did for them during the Iran Contra cover up hearing presided over by Zionist Viet Nam war zero John Kerry.In fact he was so good at covering up the Israeli role in Iran Contra during those years they brought him back to repeat his role as Zionist or Israeli terrorism cover up agent in the Senate and to along with Barney Frank and John Kerry's replacemenbt as Senator,Ed Markey and perhaps to a lesser extent even Ted Kennedy.
Although Ted Kennedy did call Barack Obama 'Osama bin Laden' shortly before his death may have been more then just a 'slip of the tongue'......
New intel on Syria meets with skeptics in Congress
Gregory Korte, USA TODAY
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said the unclassified report released by the White House "tracks closely" with classified briefings that congressional leaders have been privy to.
She said the remarks by Secretary of State John Kerry "should stir the conscience of the world.".......
"I agree with Secretary Kerry that the world cannot let such a heinous attack pass without a meaningful response, and I hope the international community will take appropriate action," she said in a statement........
Among the rank-and-file, lawmakers in both parties said they had unanswered questions.
"American involvement in Syria means articulating America's security interests. POTUS has failed to do so. Need approval from Congress," tweeted Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga.
If the Obama administration is making a case to punish the Syrian regime for using chemical weapons, is it "fair to ask where weapons originated & who manufactured?" tweeted Rep. James Lankford, R-Okla.
Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., said he found the language of the intelligence report awkward. The report said "regime officials" — not Assad — "were witting of" a chemical attack. "One could reasonably ask the question, 'What did Assad know, and when did he know it?' And if you ask that question, you'll be met with a stony silence," Grayson said on MSNBC. "We could have a situation here where there was literally a loose cannon who decided to undertake this."
Saudi Prince Bandar behind chemical attack in Syria: Report
Syrians in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta say Saudi Arabia provided chemical weapons for an al-Qaeda linked terrorist group which they blame for the August 21 chemical attack in the region, a report says.
The article co-authored by a veteran AP reporter, said interviews with doctors, residents, anti-government forces and their families in Ghouta suggest the terrorists in question received chemical weapons via Saudi spymaster Saudi Arabia's intelligence chief Prince Bandar bin Sultan Al Saud.
The report quoted the father of a militant as saying that his son and 12 others were killed inside a tunnel used to store weapons supplied by a Saudi militant leader, known as Abu Ayesha.
The man described the weapons as having a “tube-like structure” while others were like a “huge gas bottle.”
Anti-government forces, interviewed in the article, complained they were not informed of the nature of the weapons they had been given, nor did they receive instructions how to use them.
“When Saudi Prince Bandar gives such weapons to people, he must give them to those who know how to handle and use them,” said one militant.
Another militant accused the Takfiri militants of the al-Qaeda-linked al-Nusra Front of refusing to cooperate with other insurgents or sharing secret information. “They merely used some ordinary rebels to carry and operate this material,” he said.
“We were very curious about these arms. And unfortunately, some of the fighters handled the weapons improperly and set off the explosions,” he added.
The authors noted that the doctors who treated the chemical weapons attack victims cautioned interviewers against asking questions regarding who exactly was responsible for the deadly assault.
Also more than a dozen militants interviewed said their salaries came from the Saudi government. They reportedly said Prince Bandar is referred to as “al-Habib” (the lover) by al-Qaeda militants fighting in Syria.
According to Independent, it was Prince Bandar’s intelligence agency that first accused the Syrian government in February of using sarin gas in a bid to rally support for Riyadh’s efforts to topple Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
And The Wall Street Journal has reported that the Saudi spy chief is considered by the CIA as "a veteran of the diplomatic intrigues of Washington and the Arab world [who] could deliver what the CIA couldn’t: planeloads of money and arms, and...wasta, Arabic for under-the-table clout."
‘US, allies seek geopolitical conflict’
An analyst says the US and its Western allies seek to overthrow sovereign nations as part of their larger scheme of a “geopolitical conflict” that is also bound to expand to Russia and China, Press TV reports.
Press TV has conducted an interview with Lawrence Freeman with the Executive Intelligence Review weekly newsmagazine to shed more light on the issue at hand.
He is joined by two additional guests: Hezbollah Media spokesman Ibrahim Mousawi from Beirut and Sharmine Narwani, a senior associate at Oxford University from Beirut.
The following is an approximate transcription of the interview.
Press TV: Let me get Mr. freeman in on this. Well, some mainstream Western sources are pointing the finger at Syria. Let’s look at the possibility how likely do you think that Syria could be behind this situation especially now that it has been engaged in this 19-month long war of course with foreign-backed armed groups there. How likely do you think that they would be involved in this at this point in time?
Freeman: My organization, yeah, our magazine we’re still investigating who actually if in fact this attack was carried out by the Syrian government. I have my suspicions that it probably wasn’t but I don’t know for sure because I see no benefit coming to the Syrians for this.
Now we look at the situation with Turkey, the Syrian government has been accused of launching the attack in Turkey that led to this two-week old conflict between the two countries and I seriously doubt that was the case and Turkey is being used.
And who knows if the various al-Qaeda or related network were not the ones who fired onto Turkey so that was the possibility in the situation in Lebanon because as the previous speaker mentioned, I agree that there is a plan now for massive chaos in the region.
I think you have to look towards the British royal family who created this whole mess with Sykes-Picot [Agreement] back in the early part of last century and I think you have to look at the Saudi royal family and to some extent Qatar that I think there is a deliberate policy to destroy the nation states throughout the entire region.
I think we have a situation in the United States with President Obama and his crazy UN envoy Susan Rice who would like to overthrow the government of Assad despite the fact that this violates the Geneva convention, the UN and the Russians and the Chinese are very much opposed because they see that this could lead to an attack on them.
So we have the danger of immediate dismantling of nations in the region, forming chaos and we also have the potential that this could lead to a wider war, a nuclear war with Russia and China. This is quite serious and we can see the situation.
Press TV: Mr. Freeman you talked about… Saudi Arabia, you talked about Qatar and you talked about the UK. I want to expand on your premise of what they would have to benefit from doing that?
Freeman: Over the last decade and more you’ve seen the policy from people like Tony Blair when he was still in government calling for regime change and the responsibility to protect, to replace the doctrine of the nation state which came out of the treaty Westphalia in 1648. What you have now is a collapse of the transatlantic financial empire. You’re seeing it played out in Europe.
It’s also continuing in the US and there are certain families and political financial circles who would not want to see strong nation states existing as this financial system begins to unravel and the Saudi family which was directly involved through Prince Bandar and others with elements around the world in the 9/11 attack in the United States in 2001 and we see similar elements were involved in the 9/11 attack of 2012.
And I know for a fact that there are factions in the US including our present ambassador who are joining with factions in the UK, who want to see nation states overthrown, regime change from Tony Blair and they feel that this is the best way they can control and govern the area.
So I feel that it’s an urgent situation to find out who was responsible but Lebanon is going to be used just as Syria is being used and other countries are being used as part of a larger geopolitical conflict that could expand to Russia and China and I take that overall picture that geopolitical reality very seriously.
Press TV: Mr. Freeman we’re almost out of time. How likely do you think that Tel Aviv could be behind trying to create chaos there?
Freeman: I think if Tel Aviv is behind it again they’re being used as a pawn as you probably know there is a huge fight going on inside Israel including a recent speech by the former head of Mossad in Washington that opposes an attack on Iran and that opposes further destabilizations in Syria as does the United States military General Dempsey of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
So there are many people around the world who do not want to see the conflicts in this area of the world expand into a world war. However we do have the regime change faction which includes the current President of the United States Barack Obama.
What we need for the area is we should have a conference; should include Russia, include Iran, Syria, Lebanon, the countries in the area and discuss mutual economic benefits and stability and resuming the kind of relationships including Turkey that can advance the welfare and the economic conditions for the people in that region and we should eliminate and ridicule the use of war and regime change to settle these problems.
I mean this is a violation of international law. What’s going on in Syria with the West backing al-Qaeda and we have to get the Saudis and others to stop their attempts to over through the governments as well.
www.historycommons.org › Entities